Skip to Content

Debt-hit Greece sees profit in air pollution: report

ATHENS — Greece could earn up to 170 million euros for its cash-strapped treasury from a trade of greenhouse-gas emission allowances on the Athens stock exchange, a report said Sunday.

Eleftherotypia daily said a first-ever auction of one million emission allowances (EUAs) will be held on Wednesday, ironically as many Greek factories will be shut by a general strike against the government's economic policies.
The Athens stock exchange, which is overseeing the sale alongside the Greek environment ministry, has said that 10 million EUAs will be traded this year.
Eleftherotypia said emission rights fetch up to 17 euros (24 dollars) a tonne in other parts of Europe.
Follow-up auctions will be held on the last Wednesday of every month except August and December, the stock exchange said.
Europe's Emissions Trading System (ETS) is a carbon market covering more than 12,000 power plants and factories.
"One emission allowance (EUA) gives the owner of a plant situated in a European Union member state the right to emit in the atmospheres one tonne of CO2 or an equivalent to CO2 during a certain period," the stock exchange said.
Greece is struggling to emerge from a recession exacerbated by austerity cuts mandated by the EU and the IMF in return for a 110-billion-euro loan that saved Athens from bankruptcy last year.
 

Laser puts record data rate of 26 Tb through fibre - Researchers have set a new record for the rate of data transfer using a single laser: 26 terabits per second.

At those speeds, the contents of nearly 1,000 high-definition DVDs could be sent down an optical fibre in a second.

 
The trick is to use what is known as a "fast Fourier transform" to unpick more than 300 separate colours of light in a laser beam, each encoded with its own string of information.
 
The technique is described in the journal Nature Photonics.
 
The push for higher data rates in light-based telecommunications technologies has seen a number of significant leaps in recent years.
 
While the earliest optical fibre technologies encoded a string of data as "wiggles" within a single colour of light sent down a fibre, newer approaches have used a number of tricks to increase data rates.
 
Among them is what is known as "orthogonal frequency division multiplexing", which uses a number of lasers to encode different strings of data on different colours of light, all sent through the fibre together.
 
At the receiving end, another set of laser oscillators can be used to pick up these light signals, reversing the process.
 
Check the pulse
 
While the total data rate possible using such schemes is limited only by the number of lasers available, there are costs, says Wolfgang Freude, a co-author of the current paper from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany.
 
"Already a 100 terabits per second experiment has been demonstrated," he told BBC News.
 
"The problem was they didn't have just one laser, they had something like 370 lasers, which is an incredibly expensive thing. If you can imagine 370 lasers, they fill racks and consume several kilowatts of power."
 
Professor Freude and his colleagues have instead worked out how to create comparable data rates using just one laser with exceedingly short pulses.
 
Within these pulses are a number of discrete colours of light in what is known as a "frequency comb".
 
When these pulses are sent into an optical fibre, the different colours can mix together and create 325 different colours in total, each of which can be encoded with its own data stream.
 
Last year, Professor Freude and his collaborators first demonstrated how to use a smaller number of these colours to transmit over 10 terabits per second.
 
At the receiving end, traditional methods to separate the different colours will not work. In the current experiment, the team sent their signals down 50km of optical fibre and then implemented what is known as an optical fast Fourier transform to unpick the data streams.
 
Colours everywhere
 
The Fourier transform is a well-known mathematical trick that can in essence extract the different colours from an input beam, based solely on the times that the different parts of the beam arrive, and at what intensity.
 
The team does this optically - rather than mathematically, which at these data rates would be impossible - by splitting the incoming beam into different paths that arrive at different times.
 
In this way, stringing together all the data in the different colours turns into the simpler problem of organising data that essentially arrive at different times.
 
Professor Freude said that the current design outperforms earlier approaches simply by moving all the time delays further apart, and that it is a technology that could be integrated onto a silicon chip - making it a better candidate for scaling up to commercial use.
 
He concedes that the idea is a complex one, but is convinced that it will come into its own as the demand for ever-higher data rates drives innovation.
 
"Think of all the tremendous progress in silicon photonics," he said. "Nobody could have imagined 10 years ago that nowadays it would be so common to integrate relatively complicated optical circuits on to a silicon chip."

Google Clarifies Their H.264 Stance, Hands Keys Of Web Video’s Future Back To Flash

 Earlier this week, Google wrote a very shortpost on their relatively small Chromium blog to announce a big change: they were dropping support for the H.264 codec in Chrome. While they may have tried to whisper it, the post resulted in a shitstorm that reached high into the heavens. It seems as if just about everyone weighed in on the decision.

As a result of the fallout, Google decided to follow-up on their three-paragraph post today with a ten-paragraph one more clearly outlining why they’re making the move. It certainly is more clear, and that’s perhaps what makes it even more frustrating.

As Google notes, this is all about the HTML <video> tag. The search giant cites an impasse in figuring out one codec to use for the future of HTML5-based web video. Safari and IE are backing H.264, but Mozilla and Opera refuse to, and had been backing Ogg Theora. So Google dreamed up WebM and got Mozilla and Opera to sign on board. Unfortunately, we’re still at an impasse, because it does not appear that Safari and IE will be doing the same any time soon.

And that’s really the heart of the problem here. Google does a much better job laying out their vision in this post, but it doesn’t change anything. The stark reality is that by pulling out of H.264, Google is ensuring that Flash, and not HTML5, will continue to be the de-facto video standard for years to come.

Why is that? Well let’s take part of Google’s argument:

Remember, Firefox and Opera have never supported H.264 due to its licensing requirements, they both support WebM and Ogg Theora. Therefore, unless publishers and developers using the HTML <video> tag don’t plan to support the large portion of the desktop and mobile web that use these browsers, they will have to support a format other than H.264 anyway.

But that can totally be turned around. Again, IE and Safari don’t support WebM. And IE and Safari and much, much bigger on the desktop and mobile web, respectively than the two browsers Google cites above. So Google is essentially siding with the little guys here instead of the big guys.

And that’s fine, but again, I’m just not clear why they think this move will change anything? It seems as if it’s yet another example of Google setting high goals, but being a bit too sure of their ability to pull it off. This mentality, of course, keeps back-firing. And I would bet it will here too once again.

The downside is that Flash will continue to reign supreme in web video. Google more or less lays out why in the post itself:

H.264 plays an important role in video and the vast majority of the H.264 videos on the web today are viewed in plug-ins such as Flash and Silverlight. These plug-ins are and will continue to be supported in Chrome. Our announcement was only related to the <video> tag, which is part of the emerging HTML platform. While the HTML video platform offers great promise, few sites use it today and therefore few users will be immediately impacted by this change.

I’m afraid we might have to change “immediately” with “ever” in that sentence.

Love it or hate it, Apple’s devices, and particularly their mobile devices, are way too popular to ignore. And if Apple isn’t going to support WebM, we’re either going to have a world were everyone is doing double the work (H.264 and WebM encoding, not to mention hardware support) or where they just do the H.264 support and let Flash be used to play those files on Google devices/Firefox/Opera.

I just don’t see how WebM could ever win this stand-off. And without Google, H.264 can’t either. And so HTML5 video goes nowhere. And we’re stuck with Flash.

Further, the underlying issue with all of this is the H.264 licensing agreements. But Google still has not given a clear answer as to how they know the WebM codec, which came as part of an acquisition, doesn’t infringe on existing patents as well. The closest they’ve come previously is to say they don’t believe it does. That’s not good enough. If WebM did get big enough, a thousand vultures would be out there to sue them. And we may have to find out the hard way.

Google’s argument that while the licensing fees of H.264 would likely be meaningless to their bottom-line, it may harm the next round of video startups, is a good one. But it’s not clear just how true that is. There are just too many unknowns at this point.

But all of that is really besides the point right now, because the larger issue is that by pulling H.264 support, Google is handing the keys of web video’s future right back to Flash. The only way around it that I can see is if they start requiring WebM use for YouTube. If they do that and pull down all the H.264 YouTube content they made in their initial agreement with Apple for the iPhone, Apple might have to yield and support WebM in mobile Safari. But it’s Apple, they’re stubborn, and they may not do it even then. Plus, that would be a fairly non-don’t be evil thing for Google to do.

Originally, Google laid out this move as part of their goal “to enable open innovation”. Today, all they’ve done is clarified that when they say “open innovation” they don’t mean across the board. For example, they’re apparently cool with things like Flash being both ubiquitous and proprietary. And they apparently don’t even mean “open innovation” within HTML, because they haven’t pulled support for MP3 or AAC. So they just mean “open innovation” in HTML5 video. So it’s about being “open” in a close-minded way.

Long story short: Ugh.

 

original article

 

Building a Smarter City: IBM Signs Up Rio - A new operations center features an impressive high-tech centerpiece--a weather forecasting system built atop IBM Research’s “Deep Thunder” software and tailored to Rio’s climate and topography.

IBM is announcing this morning an agreement with the city of Rio de Janeiro to build a “Single City Operations Center,” or what amounts to a control room for the sprawling megalopolis. The center will draw upon data from dozens of municipal departments and public agencies.

While the system will initially focus on predicting the kinds of mudslides and floods that killed hundreds last April and left 15,000 homeless, it’s designed, ultimately, to monitor and respond to any type of emergency--just in time for the city to host both the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Summer Olympic Games.

The deal is IBM’s most ambitious smarter city project to date; previous efforts have tended to be single-purpose programs in developed cities, such as a congestion pricing scheme for London or water management in Dubuque. But Rio is a different situation--a bona fide megacity in one of the world’s fastest growing economies, in the midst of a multi-billion dollar infrastructure upgrade ahead of the World Cup. Although financial terms were not disclosed, the deal illuminates just how indispensable IBM hopes to become to the daily operations of Rio--and how it plans to do the same for cities everywhere.

The company’s involvement began in May at the behest of Rio mayor Eduardo Paes, who admitted after April’s mudslides that the city’s preparedness had been “less than zero.” The disaster cost roughly $13 billion in damage, while another 10,000 homes in Rio’s favelas were considered to still be at risk. “[Paes] was very nervous about a repeat the following year,” said Guru Banavar, CTO of IBM’s Smarter Cities group. “He said, ‘Help me deal with these floods before the next rainy season,’ which meant right now.”

IBM’s consultants were happy to help, although they had more than just software in mind. To make the most of their solutions, they recommended an overhaul of how the city’s weather, geological, and civil defense agencies operate, essentially forcing them to work together. “The ideal situation would be to appoint a sort of chief operation officer who would coordinate across multiple agencies,” Banavar said. “To my surprise, the mayor took that advice very seriously, and within a couple of days had appointed a COO.”

“This is a very special thing for IBM, because we’re seen as a trusted advisor by the mayor--not a vendor, not even a partner,” Banavar continued. “He absolutely takes us with him for most of the city-related decisions. It’s a very close relationship that has pretty much transformed the organization model for the city of Rio.”

The result is the new operations center announced today and opening Friday that will operate independently of any agency while receiving data from several of them, running it through a battery of algorithms to monitor, predict, and visualize storm damage while deciding how best to respond. “Which streets will require the most troops?” IBM materials suggest as one of the variables. “Which hills are most prone to mud slides? Are their shelters that have vacancies? Which hospitals have beds available? What is the best way to exit from a soccer match at the Maracana? How should officials direct traffic coming from the Copacabana Beach?”

The high-tech centerpiece is a new weather forecasting system built atop IBM Research’s “Deep Thunder” software and tailored to Rio’s climate and topography. Melding data from the river basin, topographic surveys, rainfall logs, and satellite info, IBM promises the system will boast an 80% success rate in predicting downpours and floods 48 hours before they occur.

The deal is notable in several respects beyond the technology and IBM’s close relationship with mayor Eduardo Paes. First, for the technology companies racing to corner the smarter cities market, the IBM-Rio agreement proves once again that simply being a vendor isn’t enough; you’re paid to solve mayoral problems. While Cisco and Samsung will contribute pieces to Rio’s operations center, "the mayor asked us to orchestrate across these companies and deliver the new system," Banavar said. IBM’s reward: an open-ended series of contracts to keep building out the system. Second, IBM sees Rio’s nascent urban operating system as the prototype it expects to refine and sell to cities everywhere.

"Absolutely," said Banavar. "We’ve already started productizing this. We're planning to deliver this as a solution that not only works for large cities, but offers small and medium-sized cities the same kind of scalability."

Perhaps the “city in a box” isn’t that far off. Finally, what’s being positioned as a forecasting-and-disaster-intervention system is ultimately more flexible than that. "While the system is initially built for handling flood and related emergencies," IBM’s press release notes, "it is built to be extensible to any accident or event occurring in the city." In addition to rainfall data, IBM is feeding footage from several hundred surveillance cameras into the mix. Should Mayor Paes choose, his new operations center might have applications that go far beyond weather forecasts by the time the World Cup rolls around. Last month, 2,600 military and municipal police joined forces in a week-long battle to oust the city's drug gangs from the favela known as Alemão, which the city police chief described as “the heart of evil."

Dozens were killed, dozens more were detained, but the majority of the criminals were believed to have escaped. Although state and federal authorities have taken the lead in pacifying the favelas, not the city, "when all is said and done, there will have to be an integration between the city government and the state, otherwise they won’t be able to perform the services citizens expect," said Banavar. IBM has already performed similar work for the city of New York, developing a "crime information warehouse" which shares information across multiple agencies. "I would hope that such solutions would eventually be applicable for the city of Rio de Janeiro."

Syndicate content